Nangle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL DE LA CRUZ and SERGIO No. 2:24-cv-2001 DAD AC PS

DE LA CRUZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

SACRAMENTO POLICE

DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff Crystal De La Cruz filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. I. SCREENING A. Legal Standard The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether the complaint is frivolous, by drafting the 28 …