Martinez

(PC) Brookins v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20241:24-cv-01158California352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY LEE BROOKINS, No. 1:24-cv-01158-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DIRECTING

v. PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 21 DAYS L. MARTINEZ, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants.

16 The assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as Plaintiff has suffered three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 5.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations upon the parties and notified them that any objections must be filed within 14 days of the date of service. (Doc. 5 at 3.) The Court also informed Plaintiff the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff filed objections on October 24, 2024, but they do not meaningfully contest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.