Hla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN-MAX DARBOUZE, No. 2:23-cv-3055 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. NYO HLA, Defendant. 16 On September 24, 2024, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On June 5, 2024 and September 24, 2024, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the…