Ramos

(PC) Ernst v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20242:21-cv-00813California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT KEITH ERNST, No. 2:21-cv-0813 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID FRANCES RAMOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, in which he asserted that he was unable to send out mail to defendants Akhila, Ginwalla, and Miraflor’s attorneys unless he traded in his regular indigent envelopes, because those attorneys are not employed by the California Attorney General’s Office. ECF No. 67. Counsel from the Attorney General’s Office, who represents the other defendants, was ordered to respond to the allegations that the prison was refusing to process plaintiff’s mail. ECF No. 68. Defendants responded that the prison mailroom had confirmed that plaintiff would no longer be required to exchange his indigent envelopes in order to send out mail to counsel for defendants Akhila, Ginwalla, and Miraflor (ECF No. 70) and as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.