Herrera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NICHOLAS D. FLORES, No. 2:22-cv-2107 DAD SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. HERRERA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action. On August 30, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion styled as “Motion to Vacate Stipulate or Compromise Settlement.” (ECF No. 33.) The court denied the requested relief on September 9, 2024. (ECF No. 34.) Defendants have moved to strike that motion on the asserted ground that it contains the improper disclosure of confidential settlement information. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff has not opposed the motion to strike. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) allows the Court to strike from a pleading “any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). However, Rule 12(f) does not specifically apply here because defendants seek to strike a motion, rather than a pleading. Defendants also argue Federal Rule of Evidence 408 provides…