Steffey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || BILLY STEFFEY, Case No. 2:24-cv-01397-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 68) AFFIRM LOAN SERVICES, LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 68), 18 || and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 19 |} 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 21 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 22 || 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 23 || (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction 24 || for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the…