(PC) Turner v. Napa State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20241:24-cv-01296California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 1:24-cv-01296-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE

v. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al.,

Defendants.

16

18 Plaintiff Anthony R. Turner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 21 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 22 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which 23 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 24 of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an 25 action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any 26 defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.