(PC) Petillo v. CSP SAC New Folsom Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20242:21-cv-01471California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS PETILLO, JR., No. 2:21-cv-1471 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CSP SAC NEW FOLSOM STATE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PRISON,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The court may dismiss a claim as frivolous if it is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or factual contentions that are baseless.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.