Taylor
(PC) Odom v. Taylor
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20241:20-cv-01120California1,948 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01120-KES-CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
v. (Doc. 43) J. TAYLOR, et al.,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
Defendants. REOPEN DISCOVERY
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
18 (Doc. 44)
Plaintiff Ryan Bigoski Odom is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Taylor, Khoo, Attinello, Ezenwugo, Mitchell and Singh. I. BACKGROUND On August 28, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment concerning the 26 merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 42.) The motion included a Rand1 warning (Doc. 42-3), addressing the requirements concerning an opposition to a motion for summary…