Taylor

(PC) Odom v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20241:20-cv-01120California1,948 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01120-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE

v. (Doc. 43) J. TAYLOR, et al.,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

Defendants. REOPEN DISCOVERY

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE

OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18 (Doc. 44)

Plaintiff Ryan Bigoski Odom is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Taylor, Khoo, Attinello, Ezenwugo, Mitchell and Singh. I. BACKGROUND On August 28, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment concerning the 26 merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 42.) The motion included a Rand1 warning (Doc. 42-3), addressing the requirements concerning an opposition to a motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.