Trate
(HC) Winston v. Trate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00182 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION
TO ALTER OR AMEND
v. (Doc. 24) B.M. TRATE, Respondent. 16 LeAnthony T. Winston is a federal prisoner who proceeded pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court found it lacks jurisdiction over the petition— through which Petitioner sought to invoke the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)— and dismissed the petition on June 5, 2024. (Doc. 19.) After the Court entered judgment, Petitioner moved to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). (Doc. 21.) Petitioner also filed a petition for writ of coram nobis. (Doc. 22.) The Court denied the motion for relief from judgment and dismissed the petition on August 21, 2024. (Doc. 23.) On October 11, 2024, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Alter or Amend,” requesting “this Court alter or amend its Aug. 21, 2024 order 26 …