(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA CARRIE ROGERS, No. 2:24-cv-00475-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 35) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, has filed a “Motion to Disqualify Judge Pursuant [to] 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455 and 636(b)(1),” and an “Objection to Court Order dated 10/09/2024.” (ECF No. 35.) Based on the title and substance of the motion, the undersigned analyzed the motion as a motion to recuse. See Narayan v. County of Sacramento, No. 2:19-cv-0466 TLN CKD PS, 2021 WL 3401404, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2021). In her motion, plaintiff requests recusal of both the undersigned and Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiff’s recusal motion is insufficient, and so is denied to the extent plaintiff requests recusal of the undersigned. //// 26 In the title of plaintiff’s motion, she objects to the minute order filed on 10/9/2024 by Chief District Judge Troy L.…