Meritt

(PC) Wilson v. Meritt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20241:22-cv-00455California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS

LURA MERRITT, et al., STATUS Defendants. (Doc. 70) 16 17 Plaintiff seeks to hold defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 The magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s surreply be stricken and defendants’ 21 motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (IFP) status be denied. (Doc. 70.) The magistrate 22 judge advised the parties that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in 23 waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id. at 15, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th 24 Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). Defendants filed their 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.