Felder
(PC) Stephens v. Felder
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, No. 2:24-cv-01713 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. FELDER, Defendant. 15 On September 14, 2024, the Court issued an order adopting the Findings and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim and denied Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 13.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full. (Id.) Plaintiff has now filed a document in which Plaintiff seeks to alter or amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). “In general, there are four basic grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted: (1) if such motion is necessary to correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment rests; (2) if such motion is necessary to present newly discovered or previously unavailable evidence; (3) if such motion is necessary to prevent manifest injustice; or (4) if the amendment is justified by an intervening change in controlling law.”…