Jonatan Perez v. J. Engleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20242:23-cv-03105California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JONATAN PEREZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-03105-GW (SK)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY HABEAS PETITION

J. ENGLEMAN, Warden,

Respondent.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation (R&R) to Deny Habeas Petition (ECF 24), petitioner’s timely Objections to the R&R (ECF 26), respondent’s timely Response to the Objections (ECF 31), and any pertinent records as needed. The Court has reviewed de novo only those identifiable portions of the R&R to which petitioner has timely and properly objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). [Optional: In doing so, the Court has declined to consider any arguments raised for the first time only in the objections. See United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 621-23 (9th Cir. 2000). It has also declined to consider objections that merely repeat the same substance of arguments fully addressed but rejected in the R&R. See Trejo Perez v. Madden, 2020 WL 1154807, at *1 (E.D. Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.