Kannan

Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20195:17-cv-07305California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RAJA KANNAN, Case No. 17-cv-07305-EJD (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL

APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. No. 142 Defendant.

In connection with the parties’ discovery dispute concerning defendant Apple Inc.’s subpoenas to third parties for plaintiff Raja Kannan’s employment applications (Dkt. No. 141), Apple filed an administrative motion to file Exhibit C to the parties’ joint letter brief under seal. Dkt. No. 142. Although the parties conferred and agreed to treat the materials filed as Exhibit C as “Confidential” under the operative protective order, Dkt. No. 142 at 4, Mr. Kannan did not file a response pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(1). Nevertheless, having considered Apple’s submission, the Court grants the administrative motion, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.