Capolupo

Capolupo v. Eills

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20191:18-cv-07458California11,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CARRIE ANN CAPOLUPO, Case No. 18-cv-07458-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

KRISTEN EILLS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion (dkt. 51) seeking dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 49) without further leave to amend. Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 54), and Defendants have replied (dkt. 55). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff, Carrie Capolupo, filed an original complaint against two social workers, an attorney for Humboldt County, and Humboldt County Child Protective Services, for violating her rights to privacy and to the free exercise of her religion. Compl. (dkt. 1). In lieu of an Answer, Defendants moved to dismiss (dkt. 13),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.