Sims
Sims v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIZABETH S., Case No. 18-cv-07153-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 35 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Elizabeth S. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross- motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 24 (Pl.’s Mot.), 35 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND A. Age,…