Pirani

Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20203:19-cv-05857California12,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FIYYAZ PIRANI, Case No. 19-cv-05857-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'

MOTION TO DISMISS AND

SLACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint (“ACAC”) filed by lead plaintiff Fiyyaz Pirani. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) and General Order 72, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Having considered the papers submitted and for good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend. If plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he shall do so by May 6, 2020. 19 BACKGROUND I. The Parties and the Direct Listing This securities class action is brought by lead plaintiff Fiyyaz Pirani (“plaintiff”) against Slack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.