LD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02254 YGR LD, ET AL.,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

Plaintiffs, DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 34

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL.,

10 Defendants.

Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against defendants United Behavioral Health (“United”) and Viant, Inc. for claims arising out of United’s alleged failure to reimburse non-party Summit Estate at the Usual, Customary, and Reasonable Rate (“UCR”) for Intensive Outpatient Program (“IOP”) services that it provided to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ conduct caused them injury, because it forced them to pay out-of-pocket any amounts that United failed to reimburse Summit Estate. In the complaint, plaintiffs assert, on their own behalf and on behalf of a proposed class of similarly-situated United members, claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Now…