Wescott

Wescott v. Crowe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20203:20-cv-06456California1,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

WO 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Carl A. Wescott, ) No. CV-20-01383-PHX-SPL ) 9 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER vs. ) ) 11 ) David Crowe, et al., ) 12 ) Defendants. ) ) )

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6).1 For the following reasons, the case will be transferred to the Northern District of California. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of a contractual dispute between Plaintiff Carl A. Wescott (“Plaintiff”) and two of the Defendants, David Crowe and Mike Lyonette. The subject contract was entered into on August 11, 2018. (Doc. 1-4 at 16) On May 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint in Maricopa County Superior Court, alleging breach of contract, promissory fraud, and negligent misrepresentation against Crowe, Lyonette, and several other defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.