Forsyth

Forsyth v. HP Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20205:16-cv-04775California4,576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DONNA J. FORSYTH, et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-04775-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ v. PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR TO STRIKE IMPROPER HP INC., et al., CLASS DEFINITIONS FROM THE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 401

Before the Court is Defendants HP Inc. (“HPI”) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company’s (“HPE”) (collectively “Defendants”) “Partial Motion to Dismiss and/or to Strike Improper Class Definitions from the Fourth Amended Complaint,” (“Mot.”) filed on August 24, 2020. See Dkt. No. 401. Plaintiffs have filed an opposition (“Opp.”), to which Defendants have replied (“Reply”). See Dkt. Nos. 402, 403. The Court took these motions under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having read and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.