LD

LD v. United Behavioral Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20204:20-cv-02254California9,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CASE NO. 4:20-cv-02254 YGR LD, ET AL.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 65,

UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, ET AL.,

10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against defendants United Behavioral Health (“United”) and MultiPlan, Inc. (“MultiPlan”) for claims arising out of United’s alleged failure to reimburse their claims for Intensive Outpatient Program (“IOP”) services at the Usual, Customary, and Reasonable Rate (“UCR”) that non-party Summit Estate, Inc. provided to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ conduct caused them injury, because it forced them to pay any amounts that United failed to reimburse for the IOP services. The Court dismissed a prior iteration of the complaint in its entirety, with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), in which they assert, on their own behalf and on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.