Mendoza
Smith v. Mendoza
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20215:19-cv-03750California12,081 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JASON SMITH,
Case No. 19-03750 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING
J. MENDOZA, et al., SCHEDULE Defendants. (Docket No. 23)
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against CTF prison officials and the Chief of the Office of Appeals in Sacramento. Dkt. No. 1. Finding the complaint stated cognizable claims, the Court ordered service upon Defendants. Dkt. No. 3. Defendants J. Mendoza, I. Perez-Pantoja, M. Zavala, J. Ibarra, B. Aguirre, R. Glaze, and W. Sinkovich filed a motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies, on the merits, and qualified immunity. Dkt. No. 23. Plaintiff 25 1 All page…