Mendoza

Smith v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20215:19-cv-03750California12,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON SMITH,

Case No. 19-03750 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING

J. MENDOZA, et al., SCHEDULE Defendants. (Docket No. 23)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against CTF prison officials and the Chief of the Office of Appeals in Sacramento. Dkt. No. 1. Finding the complaint stated cognizable claims, the Court ordered service upon Defendants. Dkt. No. 3. Defendants J. Mendoza, I. Perez-Pantoja, M. Zavala, J. Ibarra, B. Aguirre, R. Glaze, and W. Sinkovich filed a motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies, on the merits, and qualified immunity. Dkt. No. 23. Plaintiff 25 1 All page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.