In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20213:19-cv-05822California11,972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re No. C 19-05822 WHA GLUMETZA ANTITRUST No. C 19-06138 WHA LITIGATION. No. C 19-06839 WHA No. C 19-07843 WHA No. C 19-08155 WHA No. C 20-01198 WHA This Document Relates to: No. C 20-05251 WHA 14 ALL ACTIONS. (Consolidated)

ORDER RE SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

17 INTRODUCTION In a secret pharmaceutical-patent infringement settlement agreement, concealed from the district judge, brand and generic manufacturers of the type 2 diabetes drug Glumetza allegedly pledged not to compete with each other by agreeing to not introduce a generic version of the drug for several years. So, while generic competition should have driven drug prices down, the brand manufacturer instead hiked prices up. The generic manufacturer belatedly entered the market at premium pricing, and, as a result, the conspiring manufacturers allegedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.