Tull

Tull v. Higgins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20214:21-cv-01566California11,359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JASHA RUBEN TULL, Case No. 21-cv-01566-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 25 MICHAELA HIGGINS, Defendant. LEKHA TULL, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01574-DMR Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 25 v.

MICHAELA HIGGINS, Defendant.

Plaintiffs in these related cases are Jasha Tull and his parents, Herman Tull and Lekha Tull. They allege claims for defamation, civil harassment, and civil stalking against Defendant Michaela Higgins aka Caeli La and ten Doe Defendants. Higgins now moves to dismiss and to strike portions of the complaints. [Docket Nos. 24, 25 in Case No. 21-cv-01566; Docket Nos. 24, 25 in Case No. 21-cv-01574.] These motions are suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part. The motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.