Stellman

Stellman v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20235:22-cv-05273California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case MDL No. 3010 Document Filed O2/Ol/ Page lots

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL || ie on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION SA □□

IN RE: GOOGLE DIGITAL ADVERTISING

ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 3010

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel: Plaintiff in the action listed on Schedule A (Ste//man) moves under Panel Rule 7. to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action to MDL No. 3010. Defendants Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. (together, “Google”) oppose the motion and support transfer. After considering the argument of counsel, we find that Ste//man involves common questions of fact with the actions transferred to MDL No. 3010, and that transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. In our order establishing MDL No. 3010, we explained that “[t]he actions concern Google’s alleged monopolization and suppression of competition in online display advertising” — an industry that involves high-speed electronic trading venues called “exchanges” that advertisers and online…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.