In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20244:21-cv-02155California1,164 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE GOOGLE RTB CONSUMER Case No. 21-cv-02155-YGR (VKD)

PRIVACY LITIGATION

ORDER RE SEALING

9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 696, 705, 707, 710, 712, 718, 10 721

12 On April 19, 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion for contempt and for sanctions regarding alleged spoliation of evidence. Dkt. No. 697. On May 17, 2024, Google filed its opposition to the motion for contempt. Dkt. No. 708. Plaintiffs filed a reply on May 31, 2024, and, at the Court’s request, the parties made an additional supplemental submission on June 21, 2024. Dkt. Nos. 711, 719. In connection with each of these filings, Google asks the Court to seal certain portions of the filed documents. See Dkt. Nos. 705, 707, 712, 721. Plaintiffs, while filing the documents provisionally with redactions, assert that they do not agree that any of the information should be sealed. See Dkt. No. 696 at 3; Dkt. No. 710 at 1-2; Dkt. No. 718 at 1-2. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.