Ochoa
Ochoa v. Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH OCHOA, Case No. 3:21-cv-04008-JD
Petitioner,
ORDER RE HABEAS PETITION,
v. EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL,
Respondent.
12 Petitioner Joseph Ochoa, a California state prisoner, alleges multiple claims for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. Nos. 1, 22. A magistrate judge directed respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted. Dkt. No. 7. Respondent filed an answer, Dkt. No. 27, and Ochoa filed a traverse, Dkt. No. 42. The petition is denied. BACKGROUND The California Court of Appeal provided a detailed account of the material facts and trial proceedings. See People v. Ochoa, No. A153105, 2020 WL 593998 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2020); Dkt. No. 28-18. It summarized the evidence presented at trial: “Prosecution Case Jane Doe was 18 years old when she testified at trial. When she was seven, in 2005 or 2006,…