Lawson
Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAEF LAWSON, Case No. 15-cv-05128-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ENTRY OF
v. JUDGMENT
GRUBHUB, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 317 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Grubhub’s motion for entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), or in the alternative to certify an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and to stay. (Dkt. No. 317.) Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court determines oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the June 8, 2023 hearing, and DENIES the motion. BACKGROUND The operative complaint has five counts. (Dkt. No. 41.) On behalf of himself and “all similarly situated individuals,” Mr. Lawson brings claims for expense reimbursement, minimum wage, overtime, violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and civil penalties under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). (Id.…