Gagetta

Gagetta v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:22-cv-03757California2,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUSAN GAGETTA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03757-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

ENLARGE DEADLINE TO FILE

WALMART, INC., CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION

AND AMEND SUBSEQUENT

Defendant. DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No.

13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to enlarge the deadline to file their motion for class certification and amend subsequent deadlines. Defendant Walmart Inc. opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART. As a preliminary matter, Plaintiffs’ motion is improperly before the Court as an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 rather than a properly noticed motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-2. Compare Civil L.R. 7-11 (authorizing motions “with respect to miscellaneous administrative matters, not otherwise governed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.