Minvielle
Plan Administrator of the Chevron Corporation Retirement Restoration Plan v. Minvielle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE Case No. 20-cv-07063-TSH
CHEVRON CORPORATION
RETIREMENT RESTORATION PLAN, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 103 v. 11 ANNE MINVIELLE, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Defendants/Cross-Defendants Anne Minvielle and Leon Minvielle have filed a “Motion to Reconsider and Reverse Order Denying Motion to Change Venue.” ECF No. 103. The Minvielles do not state the authority under which they bring their motion for reconsideration. However, Civil Local Rule 7-9(a) provides that “[n]o party may notice a motion for reconsideration without first obtaining leave of Court to file the motion.” As the Minvielles did not seek leave of court, their motion should be denied on this ground. However, even considering the merits of their motion, the Court finds it must be denied. A motion for reconsideration may be made on three grounds: (1) a material…