Quamina
Quamina v. JustAnswer LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JESSICA QUAMINA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-06051-JD
Plaintiffs,
SECOND ORDER RE ARBITRATION
v.
JUSTANSWER LLC, Defendant.
11 In this putative class action, named plaintiffs Jessica Quamina, Tasha Davis, Kristie Nelson, Kseniya Godun, Moya McDowell, Renee Pettit, and Latoya Foust, allege that they were enrolled without their consent in recurring paid subscriptions for the online question-and-answer service operated by defendant JustAnswer, LLC. Dkt. No. 1. JustAnswer asks to send the case to arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and an arbitration clause in its Terms of Service (TOS). Dkt. No. 26. The background of this litigation was explained in a prior order that called for supplemental briefing. See Dkt. No. 36. The parties submitted supplemental statements addressing choice of law and whether a trial is required on the question of contract formation. See Dkt. No. 37. A trial on contract formation is not required, and the record indicates that only 21…