Azucena

Azucena v. Runjyin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20244:23-cv-03234California645 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CALEB J. AZUCENA, Case No. 23-cv-03234-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT

v. RUNJYIN

RUNJYIN, Defendant.

12 On or about June 29, 2023, Plaintiff commenced this pro se action by filing a complaint with this Court. Dkt. No. 1. On January 12, 2024, the Court screened the operative complaint and found that it stated a facially plausible Bivens claim against United States Customs and Border Protection agent Runjyin. Dkt. No. 7. The Court ordered the Clerk to issue summons and the United States Marshal to serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the operative complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and the service order (Dkt. No. 7) upon defendant United States Customs and Border Protection agent Runjyin at the United States Customs and Border Protection San Francisco field office, at 33 New Montgomery Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, with a courtesy copy sent to United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.