Pando

Pando v. Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20244:23-cv-06592California1,580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HENRY PANDO, Case No. 23-cv-06592-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

v. REOPEN; VACATING ORDER OF

DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT;

SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

HOSPITAL SYSTEM, LEAVE TO AMEND

11 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 9 12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Santa Clara County Jail, filed this pro se action. ECF No. 1. On February 5, 2024, the Court dismissed this action and entered judgment against Plaintiff because Plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a complete in forma pauperis application. ECF Nos. 6, 7. Plaintiff has since filed a letter with the Court stating that prison officials will not assist him in preparing and submitting his in forma pauperis application. ECF No. 9. The Court construes this as both a motion to reopen the action and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. Because Plaintiff has shown good cause for his failure to submit the in forma …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.