Enovsys LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ENOVSYS LLC, Case No. 23-cv-04549-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: ECF No. 29 Defendant.

Plaintiff Enovsys LLC (“Enovsys”) accuses Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,441,752 (“’752 patent”); 6,756,918 (“’918 patent”); and 7,199,726 (“’726 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) related to location-based wireless technology. Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1. Uber moves to dismiss Enovsys’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) on the basis that (1) the Asserted Patents are invalid because they recite patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and (2) the complaint fails to state a claim for willful and indirect infringement. Uber’s Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 29. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Uber’s Motion, and Enovsys’s complaint is DISMISSED…