Nilsen
Nilsen v. Tesla, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ROALD NILSEN, Case No. 22-cv-07472-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
TESLA, INC., [Re: ECF No. 45] Defendant.
12 This is a lemon law case involving an allegedly defective 2016 Tesla X purchased by Plaintiff Roald Nilsen 2020. Defendant Tesla Inc. (“Tesla”) has filed a motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s sole remaining claim for violation of the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”). ECF No. 45 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 49 (“Reply”). Nilsen opposes. ECF No. 47 (“Opp.”). For the reasons described below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On February 3, 2020, Nilsen purchased a used 2016 Tesla X. ECF No. 33 (“FAC”) ¶ 8. Nilsen alleges that the vehicle was delivered to him with “serious defects and nonconformities to warranty and developed other serious defects and nonconformities to warranty including, but not 22…