Roblox Corporation v. WowWee Group Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20243:22-cv-04476California796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBLOX CORPORATION, Case No. 22-cv-04476-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER LISTING QUESTIONS FOR

v. THE PARTIES TO ADDRESS AT THE

JUNE 20, 2024 HEARING

WOWWEE GROUP LIMITED, et al.,

Defendants.

12 This case is set for a hearing on the parties’ summary judgment and Daubert motions on June 20, 2024. The Court would like the parties to be prepared to address the following questions at the June 20, 2024 hearing. 16 Copyright Infringement 1. Can both Ge and Huang be authors of the Cindy, Lindsey, Kenneth, and Dennis avatars (“CLKD works”)? Do the parties have case law they can point the Court to in support of their assertions that either Ge or Huang is the author? 2. In the 2019 consulting agreement between Ge and Roblox (Dkt. No. 220, Ex. 35), there is an assignment provision that states that all material developed “during the term of the Agreement” is the sole property of Roblox. What is the “term of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.