Pearl

Pearl v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20243:22-cv-03561California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LARRY PEARL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03561-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants Coinbase Global, Inc. and Coinbase, Inc.’s (collectively, “Coinbase”) Motion, filed May 22, 2024, “to Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class Allegations.” On June 5, 2024, plaintiff Larry Pearl (“Pearl”) filed opposition, to which Coinbase, on June 12, 2024, replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court determines the matter appropriate for disposition on the parties’ written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for July 12, 2024, and rules as follows. A “district court has wide discretion in controlling discovery.” See Little v. City of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.