Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ENOVSYS LLC, Case No. 23-cv-05157-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

LYFT, INC., Re: ECF No. 24 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Enovsys LLC (“Enovsys”) accuses Lyft, Inc. (“Lyft”) of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 6,441,752 (“’752 patent”); 6,756,918 (“’918 patent”); and 7,199,726 (“’726 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) related to location-based wireless technology. Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1. Lyft moves to dismiss with prejudice Enovsys’s complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim on the basis that (1) the Asserted Patents are invalid because they recite patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and (2) the complaint fails to state a claim for direct, willful, and indirect infringement. Lyft’s Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.” or “Motion”), ECF No. 24. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Lyft’s Motion,…