Anderson

Anderson v. Stitch Fix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20243:24-cv-02658California2,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHLOE ANDERSON, Case No. 24-cv-02658-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

STITCH FIX, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Stitch Fix, Inc.’s Motion to Compel Arbitration. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff Chloe Anderson filed an Opposition (ECF No. 12) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 14). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND On March 28, 2024, Plaintiff Chloe Anderson initiated this lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court against Stitch Fix, Inc. (“Stitch Fix”) and Does 1-10, alleging (1) disparate treatment in violation of California Government Code § 12940 subdivision (a), and (2) constructive discharge. See Complaint, ECF No. 1-2, Ex. 1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.