Azucena

Azucena v. Runjyin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20244:23-cv-03234California1,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CALEB J. AZUCENA, Case No. 23-cv-03234-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

RUNJYIN, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Caleb Azucena has filed this pro se Bivens action. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice for failure to either effect service on defendant Runjyin or provide the Court with sufficient information to identify and locate defendant Runjyin such that the United States Marshal is able to effect service. DISCUSSION On or about June 29, 2023, Plaintiff commenced this pro se action by filing a complaint with this Court. Dkt. No. 1. The Court screened the complaint and found that the complaint’s allegation that, on February 6, 2022, United States Customs and Borders agent Runjyin grabbed Plaintiff’s penis and buttock multiple times during the course of a pat-down at San Francisco International Airport, stated a facially plausible Bivens claim. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.