Torfason
Torfason v. California Forensic Medical Group
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES PAUL ANDREW TORFASON, Case No. 22-cv-03458-JSW
Plaintiff,
THIRD ORDER OF SERVICE
v.
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 The Clerk issued summons, and the Marshal was unable to serve Defendant Wellpath 13 Community Care, LLC, (“Wellpath”) at a San Diego address provided by Plaintiff. Plaintiff then 14 provided a new address for Wellpath in Nashville, Tennessee, but the Marshal’s attempt at service 15 there was unsuccessful. A new address for Wellpath has come to the Court’s attention. Service 16 will be attempted a third time at the new address. If service cannot be accomplished there, the 17 case will be dismissed under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of service 18 unless Plaintiff shows cause why not. 19 1. The Clerk shall issue a summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without 20 prepayment of fees, the summons, a copy of the amended complaint (ECF No.13) with all 21 attachments thereto, and a copy of both the “Order Granting Motion to File Amended…