Kisliuk

Kisliuk v. City of Fort Bragg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20241:23-cv-06358California3,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 DANIEL KISLIUK, Case No. 23-cv-06358-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

CITY OF FORT BRAGG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Mr. Kisliuk, proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the City of Fort Bragg (“the City”) and several of its police officers violated his constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. First Amend. Compl. (“FAC”) (Dkt. 21) at 7-8. On behalf of all Defendants, the City has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defs.’ Mot. (Dkt. 22). Plaintiff has filed a Response in Opposition (dkt. 23) and Defendants have filed a Reply (dkt. 24). All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (Dkts. 8, 15). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.