Lewis-Williams

Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20243:22-cv-06119California3,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 GABRIEL CHAVEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 22-06119 WHA v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION

TRANSIT DISTRICT, IN LIMINE NO.

14 Defendant. 15 INTRODUCTION In this Title VII and FEHA failure-to-accommodate action plaintiffs, former employees of defendant transit district, challenge the admissibility of defendant’s expert industrial hygienist. For the reasons stated below, the motion to exclude is DENIED. 20 STATEMENT The facts underlying this action have been stated in full in prior orders (see Dkt. No. 72). This order recounts only those facts relevant to the instant motion. Plaintiffs, former employees of defendant BART, brought First Amendment, Title VII, and FEHA claims against BART after losing their jobs due to their refusal to comply with BART’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims were summarily adjudicated (Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.