Lewis-Williams
Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 GABRIEL CHAVEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 22-06119 WHA v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION
TRANSIT DISTRICT, IN LIMINE NO.
14 Defendant. 15 INTRODUCTION In this Title VII and FEHA failure-to-accommodate action plaintiffs, former employees of defendant transit district, challenge the admissibility of defendant’s expert industrial hygienist. For the reasons stated below, the motion to exclude is DENIED. 20 STATEMENT The facts underlying this action have been stated in full in prior orders (see Dkt. No. 72). This order recounts only those facts relevant to the instant motion. Plaintiffs, former employees of defendant BART, brought First Amendment, Title VII, and FEHA claims against BART after losing their jobs due to their refusal to comply with BART’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims were summarily adjudicated (Dkt. No.…