Broomfield

Mitchell v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20244:23-cv-06295California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CORREY MITCHELL, Case No. 23-cv-06295-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER; GRANTING EXTENSION OF

RONALD BROOMFIELD, et al., TIME Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 17,

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His allegation that Defendant Elisha Scott and Defendant Ronald Broomfield caused his prison records to add 44 years to his sentence, i.e. from a term of 207 years to life to a term of 251 years to life was found, when liberally construed, to state cognizable claims against them for violating his federal constitutional rights to due process and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order directing Defendant Broomfield, whom he alleges is the “Director of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.