Roy

Roy v. X1 Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20243:23-cv-03027California3,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 INDRANEEL ROY, Case No. 23-cv-03027-EMC (TSH)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER RE MOTION TO

v. QUASH SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT

A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION

X1 INC., et al., OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 44 12 13 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION This dispute arises out of a Rule 45 subpoena Plaintiff Indraneel Roy issued to X1 Inc. in Plaintiff’s case against Equifax. Pending before the Court is X1’s Motion to Quash Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, or in the alternative for a Protective Order. ECF No. 44. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (ECF No. 51) and X1 filed a Reply (ECF No. 52). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES the motion for the following reasons. II. BACKGROUND In June 2023, Plaintiff Indraneel Roy initiated this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.