Tremblay

Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20243:23-cv-03223California2,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 PAUL TREMBLAY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03223-AMO (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: FOURTH DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE

OPENAI, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 153 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is a jointly-filed letter brief setting forth a discovery dispute through which Defendants seek to compel certain discovery over which Plaintiffs have asserted a work product privilege. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 153) at 1-5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ request to compel the material in question is granted. By way of background, Plaintiffs (a group of authors) allege that Defendants’ ChatGPT software relies on a large language model by which it is trained through “copying massive amounts of text and extracting expressive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.