Adom

Adom v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20244:22-cv-07150California3,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BILAL ADOM, Case No. 22-cv-07150-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CDCR, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 37 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). After reviewing the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court concluded Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Defendants Warden M. Atcherly, Chief Medical Officer S. Sawyer, R. Mojica, Dr. Montegrande, Dr. Scott Ladd, and Dr. Loterzstain for violating his Eighth Amendment rights, and against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) for violating his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Two summary judgments are before the Court, one by Defendant Dr. Ladd and the other by the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.