Pacific Steel Group v. Commercial Metals Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 25, 20244:20-cv-07683California4,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PACIFIC STEEL GROUP, Case No. 20-cv-07683-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT

v. WITNESSES AND PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE

COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 153, 156, 160, 205 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court are Defendants Commercial Metals Company and its subsidiaries’ (collectively, “CMC”) motions to exclude expert witnesses and Plaintiff Pacific Steel Group’s (“Pacific Steel”) motion to strike expert sur-reply report. Dkt. Nos. 153, 156, 160, 205. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES the motions. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Evidence 702 allows a qualified expert to testify “in the form of an opinion or otherwise” where: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.