Sherry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACKSON SHERRY, Case No. 24-cv-00755-YGR (AGT)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. No. 19 MONTAGE HEALTH, et al., Defendants.

This order resolves the parties’ discovery dispute at dkt. 19, directed to Plaintiff’s motion to compel a joint site inspection of the Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula (“CHOMP”). The parties dispute the scope of the joint site inspection, which currently is governed by General Order 56 (“GO 56”). The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to compel in part, as follows. Plaintiff seeks an order to compel the joint site inspection of several areas of CHOMP. Dkt. 19-1 at 2–3. The Ninth Circuit has found “[a]n ADA plaintiff who has Article III standing as a result of at least one barrier at a place of public accommodation may, in one suit, permissibly challenge all barriers in that public accommodation that are related to his or her specific disability.” Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 950–51 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 524 F.3d 1034, 1047 (9th Cir. 2008)). This includes barriers that Plaintiff has not “personally…